Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:11:44 11/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 21:19:25, Mogens Larsen wrote: >I haven't commented on the validity of the pgn you posted. The problem was your >claims about other programs (imaginary data) and your inability to understand >the simple connection between Tiger and Gambit Tiger (unfounded speculation). >And I was right in my perception of both cases since you haven't been able to >supply anything remotely tangible regarding these issues. > >Mogens. i do not comment on this mogens. all my friends who have seen the games of gambit tiger, even my friend bernd kohlweyer who liked the petrosian playing style of rebel-tiger12 does understand that gambit-tiger is something new. he is ONLY a chess player (2420 ELO). And even HE understands. I guess Bruce understood too. we do understand it so good that we can even predict which move it will play next. and when the moves comes we can explain to you: why THIS move came and not the move rebel-tiger wanted to play. also i spoke with christophe about it. i am tired to explain what i mean. you don't want to listen. and i don't want to explain anymore. stay on your point of view and believe gambit-tiger is a chess program like all the others. only good tuned parameters. thats all. i don't care. when jeroen comes with Rc6 you say: oh - this move isn't accurate. when i come with Kh1 all say: oh - my program plays it to with 0.10 score. you all don't want to see what is obvious. you don't wanna see what is not fitting in your ideals about the world. this is what differenciates you from christophe IMO. he has the power to change his ideals and to reevaluate his point of views. this is IMO the real scientific way to behave. if you get new data, you have to reevaluate your point of views. if fritz would suddenly play very good, chess and not checkers, no draw-score stage, i would congratulate them. if crafty would develop into an inaccurate monster, that kills all other programs with speculating king attacks... i would congratulate. nichts für ungut.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.