Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Something Better than Fritz for Home Analysis???

Author: Bob Durrett

Date: 05:23:37 11/15/00

Go up one level in this thread

On November 14, 2000 at 10:32:33, Martin Schubert wrote:

<snip>

>I don't think it's possible to say "This is the best engine". It depends on the
>purpose for what you are using the engine. For example if Fritz is leading at
>the SSDF rating lists, it doesn't mean that Fritz is the best engine for
>analysing my games. I have absolutely no use for Fritz's analyses.
>
>Martin

<snip>

I have used Fritz a lot for this purpose.  I thought Fritz was doing quite well.
 But if there's something better, I'll go out and purchase it today and quit
using Fritz.

What is better for this purpose?

What makes it better?

I am all ears!

• Re: Something Better than Fritz for Home Analysis??? Martin Schubert 05:49:57 11/15/00
  • Re: Something Better than Fritz for Home Analysis??? Uri Blass 06:41:33 11/15/00
    • Re: Something Better than Fritz for Home Analysis??? Martin Schubert 09:04:53 11/15/00
      • Engines for Correspondence vs Post-Mortem Analyses Bob Durrett 12:48:24 11/15/00
        • Re: Engines for Correspondence vs Post-Mortem Analyses Marc van Hal 15:30:46 11/15/00
        • Re: Engines for Correspondence vs Post-Mortem Analyses Uri Blass 14:05:25 11/15/00
        • Re: Engines for Correspondence vs Post-Mortem Analyses Martin Schubert 13:02:44 11/15/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.