Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Which Program is Best for Analysis of Games???

Author: Laurence Chen

Date: 06:20:57 11/15/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 15, 2000 at 08:31:29, Bob Durrett wrote:

>I have used Fritz a lot for this purpose.
>
>Is there something better than Fritz?
>
>What is it?
>
>What makes it better?
It depends on the type of position you wish to analyze. If it's tactics, then
any top chess engine will do the job, if it's positional, that is open for
debate and personal preferences.  It's like using a tool, one needs too know how
the works and its application.  For example, one would never use a hammer to
screw a screw, although one can do that, nothing in the books which says one
cannot do it.  It reminds me of an episode of the Simpsons where Maggie ask
Homer to do some house chores, his son Bart volunteers to help. The first job
was to open a drawer which was stuck in the living room.  Bart comes with a
brilliant solution, he tells Homer to use fireworks. As Homer is getting ready
to lit up the fireworks, Maggie shows up and asks Homer what he is doing.  Homer
doesn't know what to say, Bart asks his mother if she wants the job done or not,
she says yes, and Bart lights up the firework.  The firework explode and gets
the stuck drawer open.  From there on, Homer and Bart uses fireworks to fix all
the house problems, except that one job it backfired, they decided to fix a TV
with fireworks for Lisa, the fireworks destroyed the TV and made a huge mess of
Lisa's room.  Like I said, it depends what you want to use the chess engine for,
and what type of position are interested in analyzing.  IMHO, open positions,
Fritz does a very good job, so does Chessmaster, and now that  Gambit Tiger 1.0
is available, I like Gambit Tiger more than Fritz to analyze open positions.
This engine (Gambit Tiger) surely knows how to attack and create attacking
chances, sometimes it backfires because it is willing to accept bad pawn
structures in order to open lines, and when its attack fails then its weak pawn
structure takes its toll, but it is surely very aggressive.  It knows how to
maneuver its pieces in closed positions with the idea of opening up the
position.  My two cents.
Laurence



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.