Author: Martin Schubert
Date: 13:02:44 11/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 15, 2000 at 15:48:24, Bob Durrett wrote: >On November 15, 2000 at 12:04:53, Martin Schubert wrote: > ><snip> > >>It depends what you're using a program for. The best program for analysing your >>(already played) games must not be the best program for correspondence games. >> >>Martin > >Fritz has a feature, as almost everybody knows, which will analyze a single >position in great detail [if settings are right] overnight. I have never used >that because I don't play correspondence chess, but perhaps many people do. > >Fritz also allows you to use the computer overnight while you are away from the >computer to analyze a set of games. Very useful as a starting point for >subsequent analyses [with or without the help of Fritz]. I use this a lot to >spot my errors, in games I failed to win, with the aim of "doing better next >time." > >For each case, discussed separately, does anyone know whether or not use of >Fritz is not best? Should some other software be chosen instead of Fritz? > >What is the difference between the ways a computer would be programmed for each >case? Is it likely that a program optimized for one of these two cases would be >sub-optimal for the other use? The options don't help if the proposed moves don't help. In some closed position sFritz has no idea how to play.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.