Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:50:00 11/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2000 at 09:21:10, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 14, 2000 at 08:33:04, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>no. you are wrong. > >Nope, I suggest you read some of the messages posted by Christophe Theron. A >figment of your imagination isn't reality. > >>did you program gambit-tiger ? > >Not that I know. Did you? > >>i see what is. you guess what is. thats the difference mogens. > >I'm just referring to the words of the programmer posted at this very forum. Those don't count, of course... > >>this is computerchess. and RT and GT are different programs and >>play different. they get different results. > >Yes, but that is irrelevant in this context. There's nothing extraordinary about >difference. > >>christophesn work on new paradigm has just begon. >>he will continue to do so. >>he said he has to overthink all (or most) he new about computerchess, >>because of the gambit-tiger experience. >>he also said he sees now parts of chris whittingtons comments in a different >>light. > >He might very well construct something revolutionary. Some of his ideas revealed >in a previous thread sounds very interesting. But Gambit Tiger is still an >extension of Tiger 13.0. There's no conceptual change and that's a fact. > >>you have maybe 30 programs, and 3 or 4 of them are maybe new paradigm. > >They're all based on the same ideas as everyone else with minor alterations. All >the programmers learn from mistakes and try (and listen to) new ideas whenever >they can. Claiming that it's unique for CT displays immense ignorance and >arrogance IMHO. > >Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.