Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Engines for Correspondence vs Post-Mortem Analyses

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 14:05:25 11/15/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 15, 2000 at 15:48:24, Bob Durrett wrote:

>On November 15, 2000 at 12:04:53, Martin Schubert wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>>It depends what you're using a program for. The best program for analysing your
>>(already played) games must not be the best program for correspondence games.
>>
>>Martin
>
>Fritz has a feature, as almost everybody knows, which will analyze a single
>position in great detail [if settings are right] overnight.  I have never used
>that because I don't play correspondence chess, but perhaps many people do.

I play correspondence chess and I usually do not use this option because the
tree contain a lot of irrelevant lines and Fritz does not know which lines to
extend.

I prefer to build the tree by myself when I use more time in the root and
anlayze only the lines that I consider as relevant.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.