Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:27:27 11/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 15, 2000 at 09:05:36, CLiebert wrote: participants: Hiarcs7.32 A1100 (CSS-Master-Version) Hiarcs7.01 P3-500 Nimzo7 A1000 CM6000 A1100 DFritz 2xP3-866 CTiger P3-840 GTiger P3-500 Junior6 A1000 Shredder4 A800 (500MB RAM) Zarkov501 A1000 Rebel C.3 A1000 Goliath L2.0 A650 Gandalf P1000 Cigorins Way Cel.500 1 rd., 22.00 Hiarcs732 (a1100 [CSS-Master-Version ?!?!])-Shredder4 (a800)0:1 the CSS-Master Version, whatever this is, loses to Shredder on a slower hardware. what a pity. Goliath L2.0 (A650) - Deep Fritz ß (2xPIII/866) remis Goliath seems to have made a big progress in programming. on a slower single-cpu it made a draw against chessbase famous and "so called" besr program running on 2 faster cpu's. was the score 0.00 :-)))) ChessTiger (P3/840) -Hiarcs701 (P3/500) remis ChessTiger ?! do you mean Rebel-Tiger13 or really ChessTiger12 ? Maybe the decision to give the normal Tiger the faster machine was not that good. Gandalf (P1000 WOW !! how expensive) -GambitTiger (P3/500) 0:1 gandalf on an expensive machine that is maybe 2x faster loses against Gambit-Tiger. aha. looks like the expectations do not fullfill so far :-) but maybe only luck for GTiger. Shredder4 1 CM6000 1 GTiger 1 Junior 1 GL 0,5 DF 0,5 CT 0,5 H7 0,5 ... hyper hyper ! DUH! count count... still counting...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.