Author: Peter Kappler
Date: 21:54:25 11/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
I with you 100%, Bruce. Any decent player who takes 2 minutes to look at this game will realize that there is nothing fishy going on. It's a completely routine win - White did nothing special other than achieve a typical attacking position that centered around a textbook tactical theme that any human can spot from a mile away. Bob, I'm sorry, but your argument about the mate in 7 being suspicious is just ridiculous. You need to look at this game again. The guy could played the last 9 moves blindfolded. (By the way, I think he could have mated a move earlier by playing 26. f6 instead of 26. Bxc4.) This whole debate is really absurd. It's just a textbook anti-computer attack -- *exactly* the kind where an 1800 player can beat a computer. --Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.