Author: Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
Date: 08:22:16 11/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2000 at 11:15:34, pavel wrote: >On November 17, 2000 at 10:17:07, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: > >>On November 17, 2000 at 09:09:42, pavel wrote: >> >>>On November 17, 2000 at 03:32:20, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: >>> >>>>On November 17, 2000 at 03:18:47, Martin Grabriel wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 17, 2000 at 03:06:43, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You’ll also get seven >versions of Shredder, including “Gambit Shredder” and “Shredder Bean Counter”, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Is shredder 4 included in the 7? >>>> >>>>Shredder 4 is included in the package with its own GUI. >>>> >>>>The 7 new Shredder engines are: >>>>Shredder 5 >>>>Gambit Shredder >>>>Shredder Bean Counter >>>>Kamikaze Shredder >>>>Shredder Brute Force >>>>Solid Shredder >>>>Really Shredder? >>> >>>is it possible for you to define them seperately? >>>as to what differances makes them seperate engines? >> >>They differ in their search and their evaluation, but I am not sure weather I >>have understood your question right. > >for instance "Gambit Shredder" is supposed to make more king side attacks, and >have less king safety eval. So overall it will play risky (entertaining) games. Yes, this is also true for Gambit Shredder. > >what about the others? Kamikaze is similiar, but often takes too much risks. Solid Shredder is very passive and tries to keep his position in order. Bean Counter will count his pieces and will probably grab any offered pawn, Shredder Brute Force has a safe search which means that he hardly misses a thing within his horizon. Really Shredder? is not really Shredder as he is much weaker. This should be your choice if yourself is playing against Shredder. Stefan >thanks >Pavs > >> >>Stefan >> >> >>> >>>thanks :) >>> >>>pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.