Author: pavel
Date: 09:54:05 11/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2000 at 12:38:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >For all this time Nimzo 8 was playing without its book, which mean that its >result should have been closer to Chess Tiger or even higher. Playing without >book Nimzo 8 managed to get a score equal to Fritz 6b 8.5 out of 20. We demand a >recount, sorry I should let the politicians run their own show, but Sarah should >replay the games against Chess Tiger 13.0 using Nimzo 8 default Book. > >Pichard. sarah 'should'? you 'demand'? nimzo8 cheated? who are 'you' to tell her? (the best you can do is suggest) ;) she is runnig this tournament (or rather test) for her own enjoyment, she posts the result to share the fun with us. you wanna have the fun? (without complaining) get your own programs, run your own tournament, and have fun :) trust me, it's not easy to run a tournament _perfectely_ she had her good reasons, as to why she couldnt use the nimzo8 book. I hate _unappreciated_ posts. I hate _stupid_ posts. but the most I hate it when one person does them both. grrrrrrrrrrrr!!! :) pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.