Author: pavel
Date: 10:32:35 11/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2000 at 13:23:22, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On November 17, 2000 at 12:54:05, pavel wrote: > >>On November 17, 2000 at 12:38:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>For all this time Nimzo 8 was playing without its book, which mean that its >>>result should have been closer to Chess Tiger or even higher. Playing without >>>book Nimzo 8 managed to get a score equal to Fritz 6b 8.5 out of 20. We demand a >>>recount, sorry I should let the politicians run their own show, but Sarah should >>>replay the games against Chess Tiger 13.0 using Nimzo 8 default Book. >>> >>>Pichard. >> >>sarah 'should'? >>you 'demand'? >>nimzo8 cheated? >> >>who are 'you' to tell her? (the best you can do is suggest) ;) >> >>she is runnig this tournament (or rather test) for her own enjoyment, >>she posts the result to share the fun with us. >>you wanna have the fun? (without complaining) >>get your own programs, run your own tournament, and have fun :) >> >>trust me, it's not easy to run a tournament _perfectely_ >>she had her good reasons, as to why she couldnt use the nimzo8 book. >> >You are correct sarah only wanted to give us a hint of how strong these Programs >really are, and she did an excellent job. Sorry Sarah I did not meant to put it >this way, but a least we have an idea of how strong Nimzo 8 should play with its >default book. > >Pichard. as blass uri said there wouldnt be much of a differance, (I agree) but it's always nice to come out clean ( to be on the safe side) but I think she is getting the nimzo book preety soon, maybe she will use it :) :) pavs > >> >>:) >>pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.