Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 15:23:30 11/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2000 at 17:44:50, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 17, 2000 at 17:20:25, Fernando Villegas wrote: ><snipped> >>c) If it is not, how this entity compares with Schredder IF two top programs are >>harnessed toguether? I suppose many experiment has been already performed before >>delivery. > >I think that it is has some rules based on evaluations and main lines. > >Example 1:If engine A fail low after 1 second and engine B fail low after 10 >seconds with the same main line then it is logical to assume that engine B is >weaker in tactics in the relevant position so it is logical to choose engine A. > >Example 2:If engine A shows evaluations:+1.1 and the evaluation goes down to 0.5 >when engine B has stable evaluation of 0.0 then it is logical to assume that >engine B understands the position better(I usually expect +1.1 to go up and not >to go down) so it is logical to choose engine B. > >I do not know if Shredder is using similiar ideas but this is the ideas that >seem to me logical to try in order to be correct most of the time in choosing >the right engine in cases when both engines have equal strength. > >Uri I feel that such a beast must be weaker than a normal program, as it have to waste a lot of computing time. First two engines computing the same pos. Then the third engine etc. etc. Torstein
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.