Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Thorsten and Michael don't have the facts

Author: Stephen Ham

Date: 15:43:02 11/17/00

Go up one level in this thread


Dear Thorsten and Michael,

I don't know if you guys are serious or just joking. If you are joking, I know
it's fun to mock the USA. But then, I've travelled outside the US many times and
am shocked at the obvious errors and inaccuracies that get represented as truths
in other countries. I wonder if that's the case here.

Thorsten seems concerned that not all the votes are being counted. Thorsten, all
the votes in Florida have already been counted (except for the absentee ballots
which are allowed to be received until 11/17/00 and are being tabulated now).
Bush has already won in the vote count for the general election. But, as any
prudent state should, if the margin of vistory is too small, an automatic
recount is conducted. Bush won that again but by a slightly smaller margin.

Where matters get messy is that the Democratic party then claimed that their
previously approved ballots were confusing to voters in certain locations (i.e.
West Palm Beach, Florida) and so have petitioned the courts to conduct hand
recounts in certain counties within Florida. Some ballots needed to be punch
holed, but for whatever reason, some people didn't punch any clear holes in
their ballot. The reasons for this are not clear (voter stupidity? machine
error?). Thus there are some arguments regarding whether a vote has been cast or
not, if the ballot was not clearly perforated as it should have been. Some
ballots merely have dimples or depressions in the paper. That's largely what the
controversey is about. Also, it's clear that the Democratic party would ideally
like to recount and recount until they are told they've won. Given the slim
margin for Bush, human error and machine error could theoretically change the
result.

Anyway, while the process seems messy for the moment, this is democracy in
action and is proof that everyone's vote counts. The system works but clearly
there's room for improvement. Can you name a country where this same slim result
would have been handled any more efficiently and fairer? I don't think that
country exists.

Sincerely,

Stephen



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.