Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 17:58:13 11/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2000 at 18:42:07, Graham Laight wrote: >Makes sense to me. > >The votes HAVE been counted - by machine. If the ballots are designed to be >counted by machine, then that's the fairest way to count them. The definition of the vote is what the machine determines it to be. The machines have not count correctly on many occasions. I heard that if bush won the popular vote and gore won the election. Then the Bush camp was going to goto court to challenge that desicion. So all this crap about the bush camp defending their possible win, is crap. They are just as greedy and lawyer hungry as the rest.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.