Author: Uri Blass
Date: 23:48:55 11/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2000 at 01:43:31, Christophe Theron wrote: >On November 17, 2000 at 05:56:05, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I analyzed the position after 1.f4 d5 2.g3 h5 3.Nf3 >>Gambittiger had a tree that includes these moves and other lines. >> >>I told gambittiger to play at level of infinite time control. >>I assumed that tiger is going to play only when I stop it from considering moves >>by using the command immidiate. >> >>I found that after almost 3 hours(2:54:29.5) on my PIII450(192 Mbytes hash >>tables) Gambit played 3...h4 at depth 18 when it considered the 10th move in the >>list of moves (3...Bg4) >> >>I repeated the experiment twice and got the same result(I am not sure about the >>exact time in the first time but it was similiar) >> >>Uri > > > >I have Gambit Tiger running since 7 hours and 4 minutes on a K6-2 450MHz on the >position you have given above, and it is still computing... > >So I would say that unfortunately I cannot reproduce the problem you are >describing... How much hash tables did you give gambit? Maybe I will try the same position with lower hash tables(I used 192 Mbytes). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.