Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Relevance of Hastable-clearing scandal...

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 11:25:46 11/18/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 18, 2000 at 13:46:04, Hermano Ecuadoriano wrote:

>On November 18, 2000 at 12:57:24, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On November 18, 2000 at 12:12:05, Hermano Ecuadoriano wrote:
>
>snip
>>>d. Did you hear? Did EVERYBODY hear? There are now several GUI's in which
>>>one can play engine-engine matches WITHOUT that old OUTRAGEOUS
>>>HASHTABLE-CLEARING after every move.
>snip
>> I'm not a tester. I'm just enjoying
>>>proclaiming this LOUDLY. (There were some hot threads about this a year
>>>or two ago. I've been away...)
>>
>>What is your enjoyment from proclaiming loudly things that are not relevant
>>today.
>>
>>Uri
>
>See the above new thread "Gandalf wins again".
>If this person used a hashtable-clearing interface, he and everyone
>reading his post should know that the results are not meaningful.
>If he used zero increment, the results are useless.

I believe that he used winboard and not chessbase because if you use chessbase
then it is logical to include Fritz,Junior or Hiarcs and he did not include
them.

He included only programs that can run not under chessbase.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.