Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:57:22 11/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2000 at 14:13:23, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 18, 2000 at 12:39:32, Uri Blass wrote: >>Junior6 is leading a tournament now when Deep Fritz is second. >>See http://f23.parsimony.net/forum50826/messages/4071.htm > >Teilnehmer > >Hiarcs7.32 A1100 (CSS-Master-Version) >Hiarcs7.01 P3-500 >Nimzo7 A1000 >CM6000 A1100 >DFritz 2xP3-866 >CTiger P3-840 >GTiger P3-500 >Junior6 A1000 >Shredder4 A800 (500MB RAM) >Zarkov501 A1000 >Rebel C.3 A1000 >Goliath L2.0 A650 >Gandalf P1000 >Cigorins Way Cel.500 > >If we order the megahertz we get > >1.DFritz 2xP3-866 >2.Hiarcs7.32 A1100 (CSS-Master-Version) > CM6000 A1100 >3.Junior6 A1000 > Rebel C.3 A1000 > Zarkov501 A1000 > Gandalf P1000 >4.CTiger P3-840 >5.Shredder4 A800 (500MB RAM) >6.Goliath L2.0 A650 >7.GTiger P3-500 >... > >so the chances for Fritz and Junior to win this tournament >by hardware advantage are very good. >If you see that Rebel-Tiger13 is not that good in swiss-tournament >since it plays very solid and can give away half-points, >and the only difficult opponent for DF and junior is Gambit-Tiger, >but they gave Gambit-Tiger a machine that is on a 6th >fast machine, they gave their best to fine-tune the tournament >the way the FASTEST machines will make it. > >>Tiger13 has slightly worse hardware but it does not justify difference of more >>than 1/2 point so I can say that Junior's result is clearly better than >>Tiger13's result. > >pah - the way you talk about the programs is really funny. >Rebel-Tiger13 is not good in swiss-tournaments, GAMBIT-Tiger is much >stronger in such a field. and Gambit-Tiger got a slower hardware. >That slow that even junior (who gets 50% against Gambit-Tiger, not more >and not less) has better chances with 2x faster hardware. > >junior is 2x faster hardware, DF even 3.46 times faster hardware ! Your math is a good bit off. 2X800 is _not_ 1600 in the world of parallel searching. > > >>It is not a proof that Junior6 is better and there are also tournaments when the >>opposite happens(see chessfun's results) but the difference between tiger and >>Fritz6a or Junior6 is not very big. > > >considering that gambit-tiger gets 2-3.46 times slower hardware, >junior and fritz are very lucky. > >with same hardware gambit-tiger would win the tournament.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.