Author: Todd Durham
Date: 14:15:27 11/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2000 at 20:58:13, Michael Cummings wrote: >On November 17, 2000 at 18:42:07, Graham Laight wrote: > >>Makes sense to me. >> >>The votes HAVE been counted - by machine. If the ballots are designed to be >>counted by machine, then that's the fairest way to count them. The definition of the vote is what the machine determines it to be. > >The machines have not count correctly on many occasions. > >I heard that if bush won the popular vote and gore won the election. Then the >Bush camp was going to goto court to challenge that desicion. You heard? Or you know? There is a difference. >So all this crap about the bush camp defending their possible win, is crap. They >are just as greedy and lawyer hungry as the rest.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.