Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 15:15:42 11/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2000 at 17:12:30, Thorsten Czub wrote: >if they now decide not to count anymore, but they have votes to count, > >they do not fullfill the wish of the people who have voted. > >if they don't want to count the votes, why elections anyway ???? > >for me there are one 2 possibilites: > >to count the votes (ALLLLLLLLLL votes) or NOT to count the votes. > >start counting and then by decision of a lawyer stop counting, that >is like a coitus interruptus by a direct order/command of a lawyer. > >Unbelievable that something like this exists in a democratic country. > >if USA IS a democratic country. i thought it is, but maybe this was only >prejudice. > >as it looks to me (in the moment - only my personal opinion) >the usa is not anymore democratic. the counting remembers me >on UdSSR elections... btw. > > >i can't believe that what the news of CNN and others tells me is true. > >this is not a democracy. in a democracy the people decide >the person or party they want to elect. not a lawyer. and ALL >votes have to be counted, not only the votes of people without glasses >or with white colored skin or living in NY or in LA. > >what is this ? can't they just count the votes ? > >it seems the bean counters are not able to count to 10. >they stop with 8 because the lawyer says: time limit reached ! I do decide. > > >the best satire is always coming from live. I think that the elections is not the greatest concern I think what I saw on the Dutch new chanel is of more importance. after the elaction there is not a real power full president because the the seats shared by the Democratics and Republicans is almost even. I do have further ideas on why you should make your choise on one of the candidates. But that would,nt be a great idea .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.