Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 16:10:10 11/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2000 at 02:48:55, Uri Blass wrote:
>On November 18, 2000 at 01:43:31, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On November 17, 2000 at 05:56:05, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>I analyzed the position after 1.f4 d5 2.g3 h5 3.Nf3
>>>Gambittiger had a tree that includes these moves and other lines.
>>>
>>>I told gambittiger to play at level of infinite time control.
>>>I assumed that tiger is going to play only when I stop it from considering moves
>>>by using the command immidiate.
>>>
>>>I found that after almost 3 hours(2:54:29.5) on my PIII450(192 Mbytes hash
>>>tables) Gambit played 3...h4 at depth 18 when it considered the 10th move in the
>>>list of moves (3...Bg4)
>>>
>>>I repeated the experiment twice and got the same result(I am not sure about the
>>>exact time in the first time but it was similiar)
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>
>>
>>I have Gambit Tiger running since 7 hours and 4 minutes on a K6-2 450MHz on the
>>position you have given above, and it is still computing...
>>
>>So I would say that unfortunately I cannot reproduce the problem you are
>>describing...
>
>How much hash tables did you give gambit?
>Maybe I will try the same position with lower hash tables(I used 192 Mbytes).
>
>Uri
It was on a 32Mb computer running WinME. So I could only give 12Mb to Tiger.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.