Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: A great idea, but...

Author: Will Singleton

Date: 17:19:12 11/18/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 18, 2000 at 19:05:56, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On November 18, 2000 at 14:03:31, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>On November 18, 2000 at 12:50:40, Hermano Ecuadoriano wrote:
>>
>>>On November 18, 2000 at 12:33:37, Ed Schröder wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 18, 2000 at 08:40:36, Arshad Syed wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Fritz and Junior completely anhilated their opponents in the KC human-machine
>>>>>challenge. Junior played some remarkable human-esque chess in a couple of its
>>>>>games. One of them was a gem, where DJ disregards pawn material and instead
>>>>>launches a ferocious attack on the kingside. The only other computer game that
>>>>>was so human-like was the Hiarcs-Deen Hergott match which involved a
>>>>>Queen/Knight sacrifice by the computer.
>>>>>
>>>>>All this and hardly any mention in this NG, except for a handful of
>>>>>congratulatory messages. I mean I have seen much longer and more animated
>>>>>discussions for lesser quality comp-human games on the ICC, with moves being
>>>>>discussed in microscopic detail.
>>>>>
>>>>>...and finally, there was this thread on the US electoral system which possibly
>>>>>was the longest and most elaborately discussed in recent weeks.
>>>>>
>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>Arshad
>>>>
>>>>I have wondered myself too.
>>>>
>>>>In a mailing I have announced a 6-game match against computer killer
>>>>GM v/d Wiel and got about zero response. What to do? Cancel it?
>>>>
>>>>Ed
>>>
>>>Your Rebels are partly responsible for this!
>>>Everyone remembers Rebel 10-Anand!
>>>Thanks for the games against strong humans.
>>>
>>>Here is an idea:
>>>Hold the match "live" at some slow time control.
>>>Do not tell the viewers which is the computer.
>>>Conduct a live, running poll, asking which is which.
>>>Reveal the answer after the game.
>>>
>>>This would be like a Turing test, and it might be feasable now.
>>>I think those whose programs are said to be human-like, should
>>>risk it! It would be interesting!
>>
>>Very nice idea indeed!
>>
>>Ed
>
>
>
>Yes, yes, a thousand times YES!
>
>Let's see if people are able to guess who is human, who is program!
>
>
>
>    Christophe

Wouldn't work.  Immediate moves from pondering would give it away.  Perhaps you
could disable pondering, or at least not move immediately?

Will




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.