Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What about Gandalf 4.32f poor performance using an Athlon 1000 MHz ?

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 17:29:54 11/18/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 18, 2000 at 20:13:32, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>On November 18, 2000 at 20:00:14, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote:
>
>>Thüringen Mohlsdorf 2000

Isn't Gandalf 4.32f stronger than Fritz 6a and Junior 6a using an Athlon
1000 MHz?, I guess NOT. But more games are needed to make a sound judgement.

Pichard.

>>Junior 6.0 Athlon 1000 +1 -1 +1 +0 -1 1 5.0/6
>>Deep Fritz 2x P3-866 -½ +1 +1 -1 +½ r 4.5/6
>>Nimzo 7.32 Athlon 1000 -½ +1 -0 +1 -1 3.5/6
>>Gambit Tiger 1.0 Athlon 500 -1 +0 -1 +½ -½ 3.5/6
>>Shredder 4.0 Athlon 800 -1 +1 -0 +0 -1 3.5/6
>>Chess Tiger 13.0 P3-840 +½ -0 +1 -1 +0 3.0/6
>>Hiarcs 7.01 P3-500 -½ +1 -½ -½ +0 3.0/6
>>Goliath Light 2.0ß Athlon 650 +½ -0 +0 -1 +1 3.0/6
>>Rebel Century - Athlon 1000 -0 +0 -1 +1 -½ 3.0/6
>>Zarkov 5.01 Athlon 1000 +½ -0 -½ +1 +0 2.5/6
>>Hiarcs 7.32 Athlon 1100 +0 -½ +½ -0 +1 2.5/6
>>Gandalf 4.32f Athlon 1000 +0 -1 +½ -0 -0 2.0/6  ? poor performance ?
>>Chigorin's Way Cel. 500 -0 +½ -0 +0 +½ 1.0/6
>>Chessmaster 6000 P2-400 +1 -0 +0 -0 -0 2.0/6
>>
>>I can't understand why Gambit Tiger was running on an Athlon 500. Can someone
>>explain please?
>
>Because he or she who operated Gambit Tiger didn't have a faster computer. It
>was tournament organized by computer chess enthusiasts, who used their own
>machines.
>
>Mogens.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.