Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 18:11:50 11/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2000 at 17:15:27, Todd Durham wrote: >On November 17, 2000 at 20:58:13, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On November 17, 2000 at 18:42:07, Graham Laight wrote: >> >>>Makes sense to me. >>> >>>The votes HAVE been counted - by machine. If the ballots are designed to be >>>counted by machine, then that's the fairest way to count them. The definition of the vote is what the machine determines it to be. >> >>The machines have not count correctly on many occasions. >> >>I heard that if bush won the popular vote and gore won the election. Then the >>Bush camp was going to goto court to challenge that desicion. > >You heard? Or you know? There is a difference. > >>So all this crap about the bush camp defending their possible win, is crap. They >>are just as greedy and lawyer hungry as the rest. I KNOW, cause I saw the chairman of the Bush camp on CNN say this.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.