Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 19:47:33 11/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2000 at 21:01:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 18, 2000 at 17:30:37, Garry Evans wrote: > >>On November 18, 2000 at 16:54:01, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On November 18, 2000 at 15:45:32, walter irvin wrote: >>> >>>>if you had a cray super computer in your house , so your time would not be >>>>limited .what kind of chess program would you create?? another Cray Blitz or >>>>would it be more like crafty .Also if you played it on ICC what blitz rating >>>>would you expect that you would get ? how many nps do you imagine you would get >>>>if it were the 32 processor Cray ??? I think it would be about as interesting as >>>>the second comming of deep blue .Also what do you think your chances to be world >>>>champion with that beast be?? >>> >>> >>>The program would be a hybrid approach. To run fast on the Cray requires >>>a lot of vectorization throughout the program. Bitmaps are cute, but they >>>don't run fast on a Cray without some vector stuff as well. >>> >>>NPS? CB could do 7M. Crafty should be able to do the same. It would >>>be tough... but it wouldn't be Deep Blue by any stretch. >> >> I think Deep Jr. and Deep Fritz are performing nearly as well as Deep blue >>has. NPS is not everything, I think the Software is just as important? Am I >>wrong? > >Short answer: yes. :) > >DB had both good software _and_ good hardware, contrary to what some would >have you believe. Whether or not the software was good is a point of religion, and regarding this issue, I am agnostic in the strictest sense. What you say may be true. It may be false. I don't think it's possible to know. bruce >> Winning the >>>WC? Difficult question. Such a machine won it twice, of course. A third >>>time? who knows?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.