Author: pavel
Date: 00:11:48 11/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2000 at 22:15:25, stuart taylor wrote: >. I don't see item 4 as bearing any relevance to >>whether they are stronger or not. > >Thanks for all your replying!Item 4, bearing on item 3? Perhaps, if opening >book was designed against existing programs. > And I am of the school of thought who is less happy about including the >opening book in the overall TRUE estimation of playing strength, at least not >solely, as, perhaps, in 20 years from now, the opening book will be its >downfall, much more so than tablebesses or the rest of the program etc. LOL, from 20yrs from now, IMO, the game of chess will be _truely_ solved ;) taking in to fact the existing speed of computer chess revolution and affordable hardware advantage pavs > So I had thought it was atleast worth seeing the differences. >For ssdf, you would include whatever is decided. >S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.