Author: Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
Date: 03:53:51 11/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2000 at 21:05:04, stuart taylor wrote: > Will this tripple brain arbitter be of any worthwhile value using a great >positional program where the long term value of immeadiate material or >positional "sacrifice" is not desinged to be clear till much later? > I can't see how. And therefore, a really strong and knowledgable engine will >be far better without the tripple brain arbiting, even together with a similar >strength engine, if they can't understand each others plans. > Then, each engine by itself might be better, because they won't INTERFERE with >each other and mix up two plans, causing NO plan. Sounds logical, but today's engines are not using "plans" in the way a human is understanding this. If the "plan" is displayed in the pv the triple brain is understanding this. Stefan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.