Author: Hermano Ecuadoriano
Date: 07:29:28 11/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2000 at 09:58:52, Mike S. wrote: >On November 18, 2000 at 22:50:35, Hermano Ecuadoriano wrote: > >>(...) > >>First, the header wasn't helpful. >>(The header of the above message was: "computer chess?") >>Second, the question asked in the post gave the impression that the poster >>was merely trying to correct a PGN score. There was no attempt to PROMOTE it >>as an interesting experiment. > >The header, or subject, was the same as in the other postings in very large >thread in that newsgroup. I didn't change it (btw. it fits fine, as this was the >question in my posting too). In the context of the previous postings there, it >was obvious that it was a "Turing Test" type question - and I think I phrased it >quite clearly!? > >Regards, >M.Scheidl You are right. I'm sorry. I didn't look at the thread. But still, your audience for the question would have been only those following THAT thread. Coincidentally, the latest thread in rgcc is about its current state of decrepitude. See my above thread, here, which might provoke more interest.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.