Author: Hermano Ecuadoriano
Date: 08:16:22 11/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2000 at 11:05:41, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On November 19, 2000 at 10:25:21, Hermano Ecuadoriano wrote: > >>There has been some discussion here about holding some >>"exhibition" variations on the Turing test. >> >>This must be done eventually. >>If successful, it would be epoch-making. >> >>I think the year 2001 is fantastically apropo, >>promotionally speaking! > >I don't think any of the top computer programs can come close to passing a >turing test. There is a well known class of positions that are easy for humans, >but hard or impossible for computers. > >The programmers of the top chess programs have invested little effort to change >this for the simple reason that such positions are relatively rare and the net >effect of trying to deal with such positions would only serve to weaken their >programs. > >I would not be surprised if the CCC membership could easily devise a test >consisting of 10 positions, which virtually any strong human would solve 10 of >10 and the top programs would solve 0 of 10. > >BTW, please ignore my other post in this thread. I unintentionally hit submit >without writing anything. Sorry. You are definitely right. That's why I said "exhibition variations on the Turing test". They were talking about playing whole games, not special test positions. And we know that the computers are getting close here. I'm talking about an "exhibition".
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.