Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:38:25 11/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2000 at 10:14:46, stuart taylor wrote: >On November 18, 2000 at 20:00:14, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: > >>Thüringen Mohlsdorf 2000 >> >>Junior 6.0 Athlon 1000 +1 -1 +1 +0 -1 1 5.0/6 >>Deep Fritz 2x P3-866 -½ +1 +1 -1 +½ r 4.5/6 >>Nimzo 7.32 Athlon 1000 -½ +1 -0 +1 -1 3.5/6 >>Gambit Tiger 1.0 Athlon 500 -1 +0 -1 +½ -½ 3.5/6 >>Shredder 4.0 Athlon 800 -1 +1 -0 +0 -1 3.5/6 >>Chess Tiger 13.0 P3-840 +½ -0 +1 -1 +0 3.0/6 >>Hiarcs 7.01 P3-500 -½ +1 -½ -½ +0 3.0/6 >>Goliath Light 2.0ß Athlon 650 +½ -0 +0 -1 +1 3.0/6 >>Rebel Century - Athlon 1000 -0 +0 -1 +1 -½ 3.0/6 >>Zarkov 5.01 Athlon 1000 +½ -0 -½ +1 +0 2.5/6 >>Hiarcs 7.32 Athlon 1100 +0 -½ +½ -0 +1 2.5/6 >>Gandalf 4.32f Athlon 1000 +0 -1 +½ -0 -0 2.0/6 >>Chigorin's Way Cel. 500 -0 +½ -0 +0 +½ 1.0/6 >>Chessmaster 6000 P2-400 +1 -0 +0 -0 -0 2.0/6 >> >>I can't understand why Gambit Tiger was running on an Athlon 500. Can someone >>explain please? >> >>A. Ponti > >It shouldn't need more. It's not much difference to the others' timings, much >less than one extra ply. > But the results of GT seem very poor indeed. I disagree. Gambittiger won the last game and got 4.5 out of 7 and it is not very poor. Junior's result of 6 out of 7 is better but the result of gambittiger is better than most of the programs. If it had come equal first, I may >have said that the few missing mhz. justifies it not getting more. But not this! > But if this is blitz (I don't see it written what it is), that looks fine to >me. Knowledge takes more time, and it is not many games anyway. >S.Taylor It was not blitz(I remember that it was 3 hours per game). Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.