Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Gambit Tiger@Athlon 500 only? (Junior=Athlon 1000)

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 08:51:10 11/19/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 19, 2000 at 11:49:31, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 19, 2000 at 11:38:25, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On November 19, 2000 at 10:14:46, stuart taylor wrote:
>>
>>>On November 18, 2000 at 20:00:14, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote:
>>>
>>>>Thüringen Mohlsdorf 2000
>>>>
>>>>Junior 6.0 Athlon 1000 +1 -1 +1 +0 -1 1 5.0/6
>>>>Deep Fritz 2x P3-866 -½ +1 +1 -1 +½ r 4.5/6
>>>>Nimzo 7.32 Athlon 1000 -½ +1 -0 +1 -1 3.5/6
>>>>Gambit Tiger 1.0 Athlon 500 -1 +0 -1 +½ -½ 3.5/6
>>>>Shredder 4.0 Athlon 800 -1 +1 -0 +0 -1 3.5/6
>>>>Chess Tiger 13.0 P3-840 +½ -0 +1 -1 +0 3.0/6
>>>>Hiarcs 7.01 P3-500 -½ +1 -½ -½ +0 3.0/6
>>>>Goliath Light 2.0ß Athlon 650 +½ -0 +0 -1 +1 3.0/6
>>>>Rebel Century - Athlon 1000 -0 +0 -1 +1 -½ 3.0/6
>>>>Zarkov 5.01 Athlon 1000 +½ -0 -½ +1 +0 2.5/6
>>>>Hiarcs 7.32 Athlon 1100 +0 -½ +½ -0 +1 2.5/6
>>>>Gandalf 4.32f Athlon 1000 +0 -1 +½ -0 -0 2.0/6
>>>>Chigorin's Way Cel. 500 -0 +½ -0 +0 +½ 1.0/6
>>>>Chessmaster 6000 P2-400 +1 -0 +0 -0 -0 2.0/6
>>>>
>>>>I can't understand why Gambit Tiger was running on an Athlon 500. Can someone
>>>>explain please?
>>>>
>>>>A. Ponti
>>>
>>>It shouldn't need more. It's not much difference to the others' timings, much
>>>less than one extra ply.
>>>  But the results of GT seem very poor indeed.
>>
>>I disagree.
>>
>>Gambittiger won the last game and got 4.5 out of 7 and it is not very poor.
>>
>>Junior's result of 6 out of 7 is better but the result of gambittiger is better
>>than most of the programs.
>>
>> If it had come equal first, I may
>>>have said that the few missing mhz. justifies it not getting more. But not this!
>>>  But if this is blitz (I don't see it written what it is), that looks fine to
>>>me. Knowledge takes more time, and it is not many games anyway.
>>>S.Taylor
>>
>>It was not blitz(I remember that it was 3 hours per game).
>>
>>Uri
>
>I can add that I found from analyzing the game that Gambittiger did not use the
>original book against Deep Junior.

I forgot to say that I did not check other games and in the case of the game
against Deep Junior it did not help Gambit and Gambit lost the game.

Uri



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.