Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:01:44 11/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2000 at 12:13:07, Christophe Theron wrote:
>On November 19, 2000 at 10:14:46, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>On November 18, 2000 at 20:00:14, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote:
>>
>>>Thüringen Mohlsdorf 2000
>>>
>>>Junior 6.0 Athlon 1000 +1 -1 +1 +0 -1 1 5.0/6
>>>Deep Fritz 2x P3-866 -½ +1 +1 -1 +½ r 4.5/6
>>>Nimzo 7.32 Athlon 1000 -½ +1 -0 +1 -1 3.5/6
>>>Gambit Tiger 1.0 Athlon 500 -1 +0 -1 +½ -½ 3.5/6
>>>Shredder 4.0 Athlon 800 -1 +1 -0 +0 -1 3.5/6
>>>Chess Tiger 13.0 P3-840 +½ -0 +1 -1 +0 3.0/6
>>>Hiarcs 7.01 P3-500 -½ +1 -½ -½ +0 3.0/6
>>>Goliath Light 2.0ß Athlon 650 +½ -0 +0 -1 +1 3.0/6
>>>Rebel Century - Athlon 1000 -0 +0 -1 +1 -½ 3.0/6
>>>Zarkov 5.01 Athlon 1000 +½ -0 -½ +1 +0 2.5/6
>>>Hiarcs 7.32 Athlon 1100 +0 -½ +½ -0 +1 2.5/6
>>>Gandalf 4.32f Athlon 1000 +0 -1 +½ -0 -0 2.0/6
>>>Chigorin's Way Cel. 500 -0 +½ -0 +0 +½ 1.0/6
>>>Chessmaster 6000 P2-400 +1 -0 +0 -0 -0 2.0/6
>>>
>>>I can't understand why Gambit Tiger was running on an Athlon 500. Can someone
>>>explain please?
>>>
>>>A. Ponti
>>
>>It shouldn't need more. It's not much difference to the others' timings, much
>>less than one extra ply.
>
>
>
>Don't make a fool of yourself by posting such nonsense.
>
>The speed difference between the winner on Athlon 1000MHz and Gambit Tiger on
>Athlon 500 accounts for a 70 elo points handicap for Tiger.
>
>Uri also points out the fact that Gambit Tiger did not play with his own book,
>which is even worse.
I am not sure that it is even worse.
I only know that it did not play with the commercial book.
GambitTiger played 8.f3 and it has - near the move in the commercial book and I
guess that it means that gambit does not play this move if you do not change the
book.
Later gambit played 17.b4 when my gambit is out of book and cannot reproduce
this move so I assume that it was in book when the book was different.
I do not know if the book was different because of decision of Jeroen or because
of decision of the operator that did not like opening preperation of the
opponents.
Here is the game
[Event "Thueringen"]
[Site "Mohlsdorf"]
[Date "2000.11.16"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Gambit Tiger 1.0 Athlon 500"]
[Black "Junior 6.0 Athlon 1000"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B90"]
[PlyCount "143"]
[EventDate "2000.11.15"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3 e5 7. Nb3 Be6 8. f3
Be7 9. Qd2 Nbd7 10. g4 h6 11. O-O-O b5 12. Kb1 Nb6 13. Na5 Qc7 14. Bxb6 Qxb6
15. Nd5 Bxd5 16. exd5 Rc8 17. b4 Qc7 18. c4 Nd7 19. cxb5 Bg5 20. Qb2 axb5 21.
Bxb5 O-O 22. a4 Nf6 23. h4 Bf4 24. Nc6 Ra8 25. g5 Nh5 26. Qc2 g6 27. Rdg1 {
Junior sah sich nach 27.Ld3!? mit mehr als einem halben Bauern im Nachteil,
bleibt nachzupruefen. Nach dem Partiezug 27.Tdg1 kippt Juniors Bewertung, im
Permanent brain sinkt Tigers Bewrtung auch deutlich von +0.70 auf ca. 0.00.}
27... Qb6 28. gxh6 Kh8 29. Rg4 Qe3 30. Rhg1 Nf6 31. R4g2 Nxd5 32. Kb2 Qxf3 33.
Be2 Qh3 34. h5 gxh5 35. Bd3 Bxh6 36. Rh2 Qe3 37. Rxh5 Qxg1 38. Rxh6+ Kg7 39.
Rh7+ Kf6 40. Qd2 Nf4 41. Bc2 Ke6 42. Rh6+ f6 43. Rh7 Rae8 44. Qc3 Rh8 45. Ra7
Rh1 46. Qc4+ Nd5 47. Qd3 Qa1+ 48. Kb3 48... Rf1 {
Junior hielt hier 49.Ta5!? fuer sehr gut; bleibt zu pruefen.} 49. Qg3 Rf4 50.
Qg6 Rf3+ 51. Kc4 Qf1+ 52. Bd3 Nb6+ 53. Kb5 Qxd3+ 54. Qxd3 Rxd3 55. Kxb6 e4 56.
Rh7 e3 57. Rh3 e2 58. Rxd3 e1=Q 59. Kc7 d5 60. Nd4+ Kf7 61. Nc6 Qe4 62. Rd4 Qe6
63. b5 Rc8+ 64. Kb7 Qd7+ 65. Kb6 Ke6 66. Rd2 Qc7+ 67. Kc5 Qd6+ 68. Kd4 Qf4+ 69.
Kc3 Kd6 70. Rd4 Qe3+ 71. Kb4 Rxc6 72. Rxd5+ {Hat nun wirklich keinen Sinn mehr}
0-1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.