Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation: STOP NOW.

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 16:18:24 11/19/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 19, 2000 at 13:10:26, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>On November 19, 2000 at 12:10:02, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>On November 19, 2000 at 10:09:12, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On November 19, 2000 at 07:34:52, Jeroen van Dorp wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I don't follow.
>>>>
>>>>I suspected that much.
>>>>
>>>>>I put "moderation" in the subject, and told Thorsten
>>>>>to cut it out.
>>>>
>>>>You said as moderator he had to stop talking because he said something he didn't
>>>>know about in your opinion.
>>>
>>>
>>>No I didn't.
>>
>>Yes you did.
>>
>>Jeroen was 100% right in his previous posting.
>>
>>Ed
>
>http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?139458
>
>Technically, you are right, and so is Jeroen.  In the direct ancestor post, bob
>told him "You don't understand what is going on, so please keep your mouth shut
>about it."  That was pretty much the whole thing.
>
>This could have been easily predicted.  We have some posters who aren't perfect,
>they are like cars that backfire every once in a while.  Thorsten is an obvious
>example.  Bob is another one.  Both of them write from upon emotion, and Bob's
>particular problem is that he leaves himself open to counter-attack.
>
>http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?139680
>
>This is more like what Bob would have said, had he been playing postal-CCC and
>not blitz-CCC.
>
>I don't think "you know nothing about this" is a reason to stop a poster from
>posting, at least not a regular one who has shown that he does know something
>about something else, at least.  The fact that it's off-topic and apt to start a
>large and angry argument is a much better reason, and one we can probably agree
>is enough reason for it not to be discussed here.
>
>I voted for Bob (and many other people, not just three) as a moderator this time
>knowing full well that this stuff would happen.  I figured that if he was
>willing to put up with abuse for six months in order to do a thankless and
>unpaid job, I would happily put up with Bob for six months.
>
>I would vote for you and Jeroen, too, and would love to have the opportunity.
>
>bruce

I have voted for Bob too and apparently you know Bob much better
than I do. My vote for Bob was based on the excellent job he had
done at the time of the start of CCC all the way back to 1997.

Ed



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.