Author: stuart taylor
Date: 18:51:43 11/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2000 at 11:51:10, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 19, 2000 at 11:49:31, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 19, 2000 at 11:38:25, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 19, 2000 at 10:14:46, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>On November 18, 2000 at 20:00:14, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: >>>> >>>>>Thüringen Mohlsdorf 2000 >>>>> >>>>>Junior 6.0 Athlon 1000 +1 -1 +1 +0 -1 1 5.0/6 >>>>>Deep Fritz 2x P3-866 -½ +1 +1 -1 +½ r 4.5/6 >>>>>Nimzo 7.32 Athlon 1000 -½ +1 -0 +1 -1 3.5/6 >>>>>Gambit Tiger 1.0 Athlon 500 -1 +0 -1 +½ -½ 3.5/6 >>>>>Shredder 4.0 Athlon 800 -1 +1 -0 +0 -1 3.5/6 >>>>>Chess Tiger 13.0 P3-840 +½ -0 +1 -1 +0 3.0/6 >>>>>Hiarcs 7.01 P3-500 -½ +1 -½ -½ +0 3.0/6 >>>>>Goliath Light 2.0ß Athlon 650 +½ -0 +0 -1 +1 3.0/6 >>>>>Rebel Century - Athlon 1000 -0 +0 -1 +1 -½ 3.0/6 >>>>>Zarkov 5.01 Athlon 1000 +½ -0 -½ +1 +0 2.5/6 >>>>>Hiarcs 7.32 Athlon 1100 +0 -½ +½ -0 +1 2.5/6 >>>>>Gandalf 4.32f Athlon 1000 +0 -1 +½ -0 -0 2.0/6 >>>>>Chigorin's Way Cel. 500 -0 +½ -0 +0 +½ 1.0/6 >>>>>Chessmaster 6000 P2-400 +1 -0 +0 -0 -0 2.0/6 >>>>> >>>>>I can't understand why Gambit Tiger was running on an Athlon 500. Can someone >>>>>explain please? >>>>> >>>>>A. Ponti >>>> >>>>It shouldn't need more. It's not much difference to the others' timings, much >>>>less than one extra ply. >>>> But the results of GT seem very poor indeed. >>> >>>I disagree. >>> >>>Gambittiger won the last game and got 4.5 out of 7 and it is not very poor. >>> >>>Junior's result of 6 out of 7 is better but the result of gambittiger is better >>>than most of the programs. >>> >>> If it had come equal first, I may >>>>have said that the few missing mhz. justifies it not getting more. But not this! >>>> But if this is blitz (I don't see it written what it is), that looks fine to >>>>me. Knowledge takes more time, and it is not many games anyway. >>>>S.Taylor >>> >>>It was not blitz(I remember that it was 3 hours per game). >>> >>>Uri >> >>I can add that I found from analyzing the game that Gambittiger did not use the >>original book against Deep Junior. > >I forgot to say that I did not check other games and in the case of the game >against Deep Junior it did not help Gambit and Gambit lost the game. > >Uri You mean that that its own book may indeed be better for its results? S.Taylor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.