Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:11:31 11/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2000 at 21:51:43, stuart taylor wrote: >On November 19, 2000 at 11:51:10, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 19, 2000 at 11:49:31, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 19, 2000 at 11:38:25, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On November 19, 2000 at 10:14:46, stuart taylor wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 18, 2000 at 20:00:14, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Thüringen Mohlsdorf 2000 >>>>>> >>>>>>Junior 6.0 Athlon 1000 +1 -1 +1 +0 -1 1 5.0/6 >>>>>>Deep Fritz 2x P3-866 -½ +1 +1 -1 +½ r 4.5/6 >>>>>>Nimzo 7.32 Athlon 1000 -½ +1 -0 +1 -1 3.5/6 >>>>>>Gambit Tiger 1.0 Athlon 500 -1 +0 -1 +½ -½ 3.5/6 >>>>>>Shredder 4.0 Athlon 800 -1 +1 -0 +0 -1 3.5/6 >>>>>>Chess Tiger 13.0 P3-840 +½ -0 +1 -1 +0 3.0/6 >>>>>>Hiarcs 7.01 P3-500 -½ +1 -½ -½ +0 3.0/6 >>>>>>Goliath Light 2.0ß Athlon 650 +½ -0 +0 -1 +1 3.0/6 >>>>>>Rebel Century - Athlon 1000 -0 +0 -1 +1 -½ 3.0/6 >>>>>>Zarkov 5.01 Athlon 1000 +½ -0 -½ +1 +0 2.5/6 >>>>>>Hiarcs 7.32 Athlon 1100 +0 -½ +½ -0 +1 2.5/6 >>>>>>Gandalf 4.32f Athlon 1000 +0 -1 +½ -0 -0 2.0/6 >>>>>>Chigorin's Way Cel. 500 -0 +½ -0 +0 +½ 1.0/6 >>>>>>Chessmaster 6000 P2-400 +1 -0 +0 -0 -0 2.0/6 >>>>>> >>>>>>I can't understand why Gambit Tiger was running on an Athlon 500. Can someone >>>>>>explain please? >>>>>> >>>>>>A. Ponti >>>>> >>>>>It shouldn't need more. It's not much difference to the others' timings, much >>>>>less than one extra ply. >>>>> But the results of GT seem very poor indeed. >>>> >>>>I disagree. >>>> >>>>Gambittiger won the last game and got 4.5 out of 7 and it is not very poor. >>>> >>>>Junior's result of 6 out of 7 is better but the result of gambittiger is better >>>>than most of the programs. >>>> >>>> If it had come equal first, I may >>>>>have said that the few missing mhz. justifies it not getting more. But not this! >>>>> But if this is blitz (I don't see it written what it is), that looks fine to >>>>>me. Knowledge takes more time, and it is not many games anyway. >>>>>S.Taylor >>>> >>>>It was not blitz(I remember that it was 3 hours per game). >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>I can add that I found from analyzing the game that Gambittiger did not use the >>>original book against Deep Junior. >> >>I forgot to say that I did not check other games and in the case of the game >>against Deep Junior it did not help Gambit and Gambit lost the game. >> >>Uri > >You mean that that its own book may indeed be better for its results? >S.Taylor I have no idea but it is clear that it could not be worse against Junior because Gambit lost the game.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.