Author: Andrew Dados
Date: 00:02:48 11/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2000 at 20:11:59, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On November 19, 2000 at 10:25:21, Hermano Ecuadoriano wrote: > >>There has been some discussion here about holding some >>"exhibition" variations on the Turing test. >> >>This must be done eventually. >>If successful, it would be epoch-making. >> >>I think the year 2001 is fantastically apropo, >>promotionally speaking! > >I will look this up later, but until then, does anyone know of a good definition >of the Turing test? I would prefer Turing's. > >Is it posted on the web someplace? > >bruce Btw.. a computer program passed 'composer' Turing test a few years ago. A piece written by a program was performed against original Bach piece. All the audience knew was that one of the two was written by a human and the other by a computer. Majority of spectators decided computer's composition was genuine Bach. The program was sort of neural network fed with several hundreds of genuine Bach to train on.... -Andrew- P.S. I always suspected J.S.Bach was not a human...:)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.