Author: pavel
Date: 11:46:30 11/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2000 at 14:41:09, Marc van Hal wrote:
>
>
>[Event "?"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "2000.11.20"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Gambit tiger 1.0"]
>[Black "Chessmaster6000"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>
>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Qc2 d5 5. cxd5 exd5 6. Bg5
>h6 7. Bxf6 Qxf6 8. a3 Bxc3+ 9. Qxc3 c6 10. e3 O-O 11. Nf3
>Bf5 12. Be2 Nd7 13. O-O Rfe8 14. a4 Qe7 15. b4 Nf6 16. Qb3
>a6 17. b5 cxb5 18. axb5 a5 19. Rfc1 Qb4 20. Bd1 Rec8 21. h3
>Rxc1 22. Rxc1 Qxb3 23. Bxb3 a4 24. Ra1 a3 25. Ne5 Be6
>26. Nd3 Ne4 27. Nc5 Ra5 28. Nxe4 dxe4 29. Bxe6 fxe6 30. Kf1
>a2 31. Ke2 Kf7 32. Kd2 e5 33. dxe5 Ke6 34. Kc3 Kxe5 35. b6
>Ra6 36. Kb2 Rxb6+ 37. Kc3 Ra6 38. Kb3 Kd5 39. Rd1+ Kc5
>40. Rc1+ Kb5 41. Ra1 g5 42. g3 Ra4 43. h4 gxh4 44. gxh4 h5
>45. Kc3 Ra3+ 46. Kd4 {The better plan for White was a
>configuration with Nd2 Nb3 to create weaknes on c6 double
>rooks on the C-file and then take advantage of it} 0-1
>
>I already posted anelyzes of this before
>
>Chessmaster still doesn't know how to spell Zug Zwang but that's because it's a
>chessprogram not a wordprosecor (do I doubt that this word stands standard in a
>wordprosecor)
>
>Marc van Hal
well it did win the game,
if I was a commercial programmer than i would rather be happy with the win then
knowing what "Zug Zwang" is :)
pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.