Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 17:30:11 11/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2000 at 09:44:23, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 20, 2000 at 09:20:39, Christopher R. Dorr wrote: > >>It doesn't seem like he's being a poor loser at all (to me), nor does it seem >>that he's expressing moral outrage. > >If a person who operates a computer account, and doesn't mind telling the world >about his victories against other computer accounts, gets annoyed when losing to >someone who may or may not have been using a computer, then that person is a >poor loser in my opinion. Especially when the only purpose of the account is >supposed to be personal enjoyment. > >> It's just an interesting question. > >We'll have to disagree on that. > >>The games >>and player history do seem suspect, and who better to analyse the possibility of >>cheating than the people here? > >The last cheater thread didn't prove that people here are more competent >deciding such a question. > >Mogens. As long if he only uses the program it is to prove but if he only temporerly uses a program in the game it is a lot harder But still you will find the alogoritmes back from the program even when diferent personeletys are used and manny times this is the biggest help if he only threatds without building up a plan in longer games then it's a computer. Marc van Hal
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.