Author: j koss
Date: 22:54:50 11/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
Setting the record straight. No I didnt cheat nor did I ask to be dragged into a debate on a moderated forum which I dont normaly read. I recieved messages from people who ..do.. read this forum. Its always nice to come home from work, have dinner, log into fics and find messages about someone attacking you on some godforsaken moderated "message board" you havent visited in several years. I had to create a new I.D. (dont remember old one.. dont use same ISP) just to read what was being said. To those who give me at least a little credit, thanks. To those that don't.. grow up guys! There will not be any evidence that I cheated because I didn't. The suspicion cast on the time it took for me to move is highly speculative at best. I took more time to think when "suprise" moves came at me. A computer wouldnt be so suprised at tactics like a rook taking a defended bishop. It would expect it. The history games of AndreD show the same sort of "pattern" only faster (all his history games are 3 0) ---- The accuser (whos handle is 'iwonone' on fics) promises to: iwonone tells you: Good luck, I just finished reading your message on the CCC.. \ check back tomorrow.. you are going to look like an idiot there iwonone tells you: You should have just shut up... iwonone tells you: It actually does. Quite a few of the best computer \ programers, and GM/IM's read that, trust me, you are going to look like a \ fool ---- Poor loser? Likely. I will check back in a day or so but I doubt I will respond. I know how these forums get. Hundreds of messages could be generated daily from their trolling.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.