Author: Harald Faber
Date: 00:48:35 11/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2000 at 01:11:31, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>I can add that I found from analyzing the game that Gambittiger did not use the >>>>original book against Deep Junior. >>> >>>I forgot to say that I did not check other games and in the case of the game >>>against Deep Junior it did not help Gambit and Gambit lost the game. >>> >>>Uri >> >>You mean that that its own book may indeed be better for its results? >>S.Taylor > >I have no idea but it is clear that it could not be worse against Junior because >Gambit lost the game. As operator of Gambit Tiger I can say that GT used the original opening book. The first move out of book was c2-c4. GT didn't lose that game because of a bad opening line. After winning the pawn and having placed the a- and b-pawn on a4 and b4 and the knight on a5 and the bishop on b5 the white position is clearly better, this is a stable position although it opened the king's position. I still wonder where the game went wrong. Probably because GT went over to the kingside for a bluff attack that didn't work but cost 2 pawns and the rook vs bishop.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.