Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 06:20:41 11/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2000 at 04:06:32, Harald Faber wrote: >On November 18, 2000 at 20:00:14, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: > >>Thüringen Mohlsdorf 2000 >> >>Junior 6.0 Athlon 1000 +1 -1 +1 +0 -1 1 5.0/6 >>Deep Fritz 2x P3-866 -½ +1 +1 -1 +½ r 4.5/6 >>Nimzo 7.32 Athlon 1000 -½ +1 -0 +1 -1 3.5/6 >>Gambit Tiger 1.0 Athlon 500 -1 +0 -1 +½ -½ 3.5/6 >>Shredder 4.0 Athlon 800 -1 +1 -0 +0 -1 3.5/6 >>Chess Tiger 13.0 P3-840 +½ -0 +1 -1 +0 3.0/6 >>Hiarcs 7.01 P3-500 -½ +1 -½ -½ +0 3.0/6 >>Goliath Light 2.0ß Athlon 650 +½ -0 +0 -1 +1 3.0/6 >>Rebel Century - Athlon 1000 -0 +0 -1 +1 -½ 3.0/6 >>Zarkov 5.01 Athlon 1000 +½ -0 -½ +1 +0 2.5/6 >>Hiarcs 7.32 Athlon 1100 +0 -½ +½ -0 +1 2.5/6 >>Gandalf 4.32f Athlon 1000 +0 -1 +½ -0 -0 2.0/6 >>Chigorin's Way Cel. 500 -0 +½ -0 +0 +½ 1.0/6 >>Chessmaster 6000 P2-400 +1 -0 +0 -0 -0 2.0/6 >> >>I can't understand why Gambit Tiger was running on an Athlon 500. Can someone >>explain please? >> >>A. Ponti > > >Sure. I have no faster computer. :-) >The next tourney is in March 2001, everyone feel free to provide me with the >latest hardware so that I can start with GT on 1.3GHz or so. Or collect money so >that I can afford to upgrade my computer to at least 1GHz. >If you don't then don't complain about the hardware. All the critics here and in >the German Gambitsoft forum are invited to play themselves on fast machines. >BTW maybe I missed that I could have used an Athlon 1000 for extra money, >provided by the tournament director. Don't know, will figure this out for the >tourney in March. But the several system crashes of all these fast machines >showed that it was better to use the K7-500 (which didn't crash even once) if >you look at the final result...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.