Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: How does DB contribute to other fields than chess and ad?

Author: Walter Koroljow

Date: 09:56:10 11/21/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 21, 2000 at 09:40:07, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On November 21, 2000 at 07:38:25, Pham Minh Tri wrote:
>
>>Hi everyone,
>>
>>IBM said that after tournament with Kasparov, Deep Blue would return to normal
>>work and contribute to some fields like finance, medicine, education, molecular
>>dynamics problem and so on. However I hardly believe that DB technique could be
>>useful to those fields, at least in a direct way. Today chess technique turns
>>into a very specific one in the way of its searching, organizations of database
>>and knowledge. This is almost different from techniques of any other field. As a
>>result, besides chess and ad, DB chess technique would be useless.
>>
>>This is my thought only and I will be happy if someone could show me some
>>evidence that DB and its technique have contributed successfully to other fields
>>(and my hobby of computer chess would be useful for more people than the chess
>>enthusiasts and me :-) ).
>>
>>Pham
>
>
>There statement was made on the basis of "deep blue the SP-2".  And in that
>regard it was correct, since SP-2's are used around the world in
>high-performance computing applications.  That's a very "loose" definition of
>DB, of course.  DB the "software" had nothing to do with anything but chess.
>DB the special-purpose hardware chip also only played chess.
>
>It was just a clever bit of marketing...

Quite so.  I know of no applications, nevertheless it seems that there should be
some applications for clever search outside formal games.  Military applications
come to mind.

Here is a simple cartoon of a potential application.  Imagine two ships with one
trying to traverse an area filled with islands of different shape.  The second
ship is trying to intercept the first.  Both ships are under satellite
surveillance and know each other's positions at all times.  The choice of right
or left around an island is analogous to a chess "move".

Tactics abound: for example, if the ships are on opposite sides of an island
they are in Zugzwang.  If the interceptor goes right, the aggressor can also go
right avoiding the defender, etc., etc.  Such tactics can and should be foreseen
many turns (pun intended) in advance.  Hence the applicability of search.

Perhaps some time I will think about applications seriously and write a
proposal...

Cheers,

Walter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.