Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 14:35:26 11/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2000 at 01:41:41, Andrew Dados wrote: >On November 21, 2000 at 01:34:07, j koss wrote: > >> > Time usage looks typical for manually operated computer program. >> >>Hey AndreD >> >>I am disappointed in you. > >and vice versa - Which game do you think he cheated in? Surely not all of them. I'd be happy to look at one of those games with a computer. I looked at them with my eyeballs, and one of the games looke like a typical human attack. The one that was a win was definitely a human at the very end, since a computer finds a faster mate in KQ vs K. A human in a hurry or without much interest in being optimal plays that more systematically, and that's what was going on at the end of the game at least. I read Mr. Koss' account of the game, and his thinking sounds like human thinking. He grabbed onto the tiger's tail and tried to hang on, and ended up surprised that he was not eaten and that the tiger had exhausted itself. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.