Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 14:55:05 11/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2000 at 17:14:01, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 20, 2000 at 08:12:54, Ed Schröder wrote: >>>the classes should not get out of order. > >>>why did you leave H+G and came together with TASC running rebel >>>on the ARM-chess-machines when you were that much satisfied with >>>the H+G politics ? > >>H+G was a fine company. I went to Tasc with the RISC program because >>H+G did not want to invest in new hardware. > >as i said: YOU for the middle class, RICHARD for investing money and >for getting it back selling very expensive machines. You do not have so much experience in business dealings perhaps! You normally make the biggest money on your best volume product. The expensive ones are normally what you use for showing your supperior quality :-) and sell the cheap or middle priced products! Torstein > >tasc offered you in another way what schaetzle and bsteh could have offered >you: better hardware. i would have decided the same way you did. >and : as the results of the next championship (madrid?!) showed >you were right to change. > >> And as the market for >>high-end expensive dedicated chess computers was on its way back they >>were right and simply bought the hardware and software one year later >>from Tasc. > >right. >thats true. >it was with this hardware you came very very close to richard. > >it was the end of everything. > >>Come on Thorsten, you don't can expect from me to defend CSS, now >>do you....? :-) > >you can defend whatever you want. even css. >this is the good thing about free speech. that everyone is free >to defend or talk about whatever he wants. >even I could defend css or frederic, if i want. >so far i had no reason to do so :-)) > >>Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.