Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 18:51:57 11/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2000 at 21:33:04, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 21, 2000 at 21:10:35, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On November 21, 2000 at 20:24:31, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >> >>>On November 21, 2000 at 20:11:10, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>> >>>>What does Crafty think of the Reti study: >>>> >>>>[D]7K/8/k1P5/7p/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1 >>>> >>>>White to move draws. I might have this slightly wrong, because I'm constructing >>>>it from memory. >>>> >>>>bruce >>> >>>I get a drawscore at ply 9 from Crafty in this position. >>> >>>This is the last line I got: >>> >>>22-> 1:01 -0.50 1. Kg7 Kb6 2. Kf6 Kxc6 3. Kg5 h4 4. >>> Kxh4 Kc7 5. Kh5 Kb6 6. Kh6 Ka5 7. Kg6 >>> Kb6 8. Kh5 Ka5 9. Kh6 Kb6 10. Kg6 Ka5 >>> 11. Kh5 Kb6 >> >>By be this played Fritz 6 in 0.00 Min: 1.Kg7 0.00 ! >> >>here a new simple position: >>It was a analysis from a game, and analysis was by GM Krasenkow ! >> >>[D]8/8/1ppk4/p4P2/4K3/8/PP6/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Only winning move is 1.a4 ! GM Krasenkow. > >Gandalf needs 2 minutes to stick with a4 on my computer. > >Mogens. Thanks ! I have a question: In my first simple position (see posting) play Gandalf 4.32f (32 MB hash), first 1.Kxb6 and after >14 minutes correct 1.Kc6 ! Under the Genius 65 (MCS 32 MB hash) Gandalf played first 1.Kd7 (not 1.Kxb6)!? I can the analysis from Genius , i'm sorry, not copy. (config in *.res was equal) why this ? Regards, Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.