Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:04:28 11/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2000 at 17:25:34, Torstein Hall wrote: >On November 20, 2000 at 21:59:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On November 20, 2000 at 17:46:56, Torstein Hall wrote: >> >>>On November 20, 2000 at 09:33:58, walter irvin wrote: >>> >>>>On November 19, 2000 at 23:08:54, Daniel Chancey wrote: >>>> >>>>>Tiger II - Crafty Time: 1 move/7-8 hours every day. >>>>> >>>>>1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Bg5 Be7 6.e3 O-O 7.Qc2 Nbd7 Tiger out of >>>>>book. >>>>> >>>>>Castle2000 >>>> >>>>if you have the stay to power to play this game all the way through , you may be >>>>surprised at the winner .at 7 and 8 hrs a moves i think the game will be >>>>determined more by strategy than tactics .games like these tell who is really >>>>stronger . >>> >>>Or perhaps you just will be seeing the program best optimized for overnight >>>analysing! >>> >>>Torstein >> >> >>Just remember that overnight right now is tournament time controls in a couple >>of years... > >Of course, but I guess you tune for the hardware you got at the moment! > >Torstein Yes. but if you believe your eval is better than your search, then more hardware will narrow the gap and improve performance. If you believe your search is better than your eval, this might not be as true.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.