Author: Aloisio Ponti Lopes
Date: 06:07:41 11/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2000 at 11:59:48, Christophe Theron wrote: >The problem is the people that will just have a look at the rankings and say, >"What, Gambit Tiger finished only in 4th position? This program sucks!". > >But we have been having this problem for a long time with people not able to >read the SSDF list correctly, so it's nothing new. > >I'm rather satisfied with the performance of Gambit Tiger in this tournament. >Once again, GT has proven that it was possible to play strong with an >interesting playing style. And that Gambit Tiger is probably more suited for >short tournaments than Chess Tiger... > >Thanks Harald. > > > > Christophe IMHO I think Tiger could win this tournament if it was running on equal hardware. It is a wonderful program. I've played against it many times since I received my Rebel 11 CD. I only think that there's a great gap between Chess Tiger, the engine, and Chess Partner, the interface, which has to improve _a _lot (better 3D graphics, eng-eng support, maybe tournament support as ChessBase, autoflag inside the interface (as Winboard), better sounds (ugh! don't like them too - someone posted here the same)). What I see is that the Chess Partner interface is getting better quickly, so I don't mind waiting the next versions... (I remember the first time I got ChessBase 4, did not like to work with it too...) I also think that Tiger will top the SSDF list(or at least #2, my only doubt is about Shredder 5). A. Ponti
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.