Author: Christopher R. Dorr
Date: 09:50:44 11/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2000 at 09:30:31, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On November 21, 2000 at 01:12:38, John Smith wrote: > >>What's so objectionable about it ? > >How about implicit child abuse which is a big problem in any society? >I tend to think that the whole thread should be deleted because of the >infelicitous and insulting metaphor. > >This is a computer chess forum that should not promote _any_ abuse, especially >not the abuse of the defenceless. > >*** Djordje "Promote" abuse? In what possible way does the use of a common English folkism promote the abuse of *anything*? Should we stop using the work "beat" as in "Fritz Beat Gnuchess" because it can refer to (in another conext) somebody being "beaten"? How about preventing the discussion of "white pieces" because the "white" part can refer to a racial issues in the US? We're all (supposedly) adults here. It is inconceivable to me that an adult, intelligent, educated person could see the use of this phrase as somehow promoting something negative. You certainly have the right to not use a phrase that you find objectionable, but I don't feel you have some inherent right to *never* see something you don't like. Christopher
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.