Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Beta -Testing Proficiency in Rebel Tiger Case

Author: Chris Taylor

Date: 11:53:16 11/22/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 22, 2000 at 11:05:36, Fernando Villegas wrote:

>Just a simple question: if Rebel Tiger cannot mate with bishop and knight, as
>has been said here and nobody has rejected that statement, what kind of work
>beta testers did? Or maybe I am mistaken about what a beta tester does? I
>supposed that it is a heavy work, a systematic effort to grasp problems. Now it
>seems to me it is not so, at least not always. It seems more or less as a review
>where you play the program and from time to time you write a note or two about
>the Gui or something than can appear during the game. So if not bishop+knight
>situation appears, the problems is not grasped. In fact, that kind of endings
>are very rare, but then, if beta testing is just to look at just what appears, I
>wonder which is the difference between betatesting and toying.
>I have never offered myself to beta testing nothing because precisely of that: I
>have no time not the desire to do such a heavy effort in detail. Sometimes in
>the past I have reviewed programs -programs that I have bought- and I did that
>in confessed subjetive terms, so everyone has been free to take it as a
>entertaiment or as some kind of light info, but of course nobody, never, thought
>I was doing a full job of the kind K.K - Alan Tomalty- did.
>So my point is: please, do not engage in such comitments unless you are prepared
>to go to the end. Do not do that because I put my faith in what you test, other
>people put his faith also and so decisions are taken because we think "well, all
>these enthusiastic beta tester cannot be wrong".
>Just a last thing: I do not say this from a disppointment with Rebel Tiger. I
>like it very much and I am sure that anyway Theron will deliver a patch long
>before I ever reach an ending of that kind: in fact it will never happen because
>I always surrender with just one pawn less. My disappointment is with my fellows
>here, specially with those that sometimes make his comments from the highness of
>his status as beta testers but then, out of the blue, facts show thet did not
>perform the work as was due to be done.
>Sorry if I hurt somebody. All this is writen under the premise B+N mates are not
>in Tiger capabilities by now.
>Fernando

As a beta Tester, all I did, is much the same as I am doing now.  Pitting
different engines through Auto232.  I don't recal seeing a KBN v K  It would not
have occured to me, to try it out.  Hmmmm.

Chris Taylor



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.