Author: Georg Langrath
Date: 20:41:43 11/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
I tried it in a engine-engine match within Century3. It was your settings against Century3 strongest setting, 3 min each move. Your engine won. Look at move 20. Okej, I know that 1 match says little, but at least it says that yor engine is strong and plays spectacular. Here is the match: [Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "??.??.????"] [Round "?"] [White "gambit.eng"] [Black "Rebel Century 3"] [Result "*"] [WhiteElo "?"] [BlackElo "?"] [ECO "D20"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. e4 Nc6 4. Be3 Nf6 5. f3 e5 6. d5 Nd4 7. Bxd4 exd4 8. Qxd4 Bb4+ 9. Nc3 O-O 10. Bxc4 c6 11. Nge2 cxd5 12. exd5 Qa5 13. O-O-O Bd7 14. Kb1 Rac8 15. g4 b5 16. Bb3 Bd6 17. Ng3 h6 18. Nge4 Nxe4 19. Nxe4 Bc7 20. Nf6+ gxf6 21. Qxf6 Bd8 22. Qxh6 b4 23. Rhg1 Qb6 24. d6 Qc5 25. f4 Be6 26. Bxe6 Qc2+ 27. Ka1 fxe6 28. g5 Rf7 29. Rge1 e5 30. Qe6 Qf5 31. Qxf5 Rxf5 32. fxe5 Bxg5 33. e6 Kf8 34. h3 Bf6 35. e7+ Bxe7 36. Rxe7 Rd8 37. Re6 Kf7 38. Ree1 Rd7 39. Rd4 a5 40. Kb1 Rf6 41. Red1 Rh6 42. R1d3 Ke8 43. Rd5 Ra7 44. Kc2 Kd7 45. Kb3 Rh4 46. Ka4 Ra6 47. Kb5 Ra8 48. Rc5 Rb8+ 49. Kxa5 Ra8+ 50. Kb6 Rb8+ 51. Ka7 Rc8 52. Rxc8 Kxc8 53. Kb6 Kd7 54. Kc5 Rf4 55. b3 Rf2 56. Rd4 Rc2+ 57. Kxb4 Rxa2 58. h4 Ra8 59. Kb5 * On November 22, 2000 at 15:17:27, Marc van Hal wrote: >Selectivety 125 >Mobilety 125 >Kinsafety 150 >pins125 >pawnstructure 105 >passed pawns 110 >chess knowledge 200 > >When I did send these settings to Schroder BV they where called Alexander1 >because it was the improved version from Alexal >Both named after Alexander Alekhine > >I also did send them the mesage that this personelety finds a kings atack in >every position > >The diference between this personelety and Gambit tiger is that tiger is faster >And it should preferably play with system tiger on (wich is not included in >Rebel anymore) > >Besides this Jeroen Noomen also has an CT book in MVS Wich I know cause I did >send him this file some years ago >Only d5 is active because then the program can become a specialist in one >opening >Stil he should have put some new anelyzes in the book I think > >All this is where the fuss was about I made yesterday > >Harald Faber did get a thank you While I was forgotten again!!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.