Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:11:30 11/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2000 at 11:05:04, Uri Blass wrote: <snipped> >I agree that it seems not to be a good strategy but I saw it happens with >Gambittiger and Fritz5.32 > >Here is an example for the change in the evaluation in Gambittiger > >The scores before 44.bxc6: > >3.54 depth 11 >2.96 depth 12 >2.40 depth 13 >2.30 depth 14 >1.80 depth 15 >1.68 depth 16 > >Gambit's main line is always 44.bxc6 Rc7 > >The scores after bxc6 Rc7: >1.66 depth 9 >1.72 depth 10 >1.54 depth 11 >1.12 depth 12 >1.32 depth 13 >1.30 depth 14 >1.18 depth 15 > > > >I cannot be sure about the exact difference because I do not know to translate >depthes because it is possible that there are different extensions but it seems >that the difference in the static evaluation of part of the positions is more >than one pawn after 2 plies. > >Uri Here is a diagram for the relevant position that happened in a game (Gambit-Nimzo) I gave Gambit to forget about everything after playing the moves bxc6 Rc7 by downloading tiger13 and downloading gambit again because I did not want gambit to be biased by previous search(the change in score happen also in cases when I do not do it) [D]1k1r4/p2r4/1pn5/1P2p1q1/P3Qp1p/5P1P/2R3P1/6BK w - - 0 1 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.